The Fact Daily, March 2, 2011
Dear Knight's insistence sorry, but we have the impression that you continue to get hurt . Not his fault, God forbid: You are not to blame, never. But because of those around her, and if we can, the ill-advised.
The other day, for example, she announced to the audience a choice of donkeys, including several ministers, that you have "given up time to have a cell phone because mine was exposed to all kinds of interception . Now, do not know who has recommended such a folly, but we can assure you that he has the deceived. First of all, your phone is not never been caught (since 1994 You are a parliamentarian and as such can not be heard, first, as many times investigated does not appear that the judges have ever tapped phones, except for a Once, in 1983, when he was suspected of drug trafficking, prosecution then closed). Every time his voice was picked up in telephone conversations, it is because the judges were intercepting phones of your interlocutors : characters investigated (the estate in the Valley, Dell'Utri, Sacca, Cuffaro) or possible victims of his crimes (Ruby-Papi-Karima and other girls).
Which means, Mr. President, never to be heard not just give up the phone and use that of her staff caposcorta (as for the police to call in Ruby) or someone else, or perhaps a user setting: If a Judge listens for the other party, you can also speak from a phone booth, as long as the equipment arrives, but his voice will be recorded the same. So if you want to be heard, one of two things: or just stop talking (making, among other things, a great service to our ears and the whole nation), perhaps by switching to safer system pizzini very popular in environments close to you, or try to select best his audience, avoiding mobsters, corrupt, pimps and whores. Each year, across Italy, are caught between 5 and 10 thousand people, most offenders matriculated here, you try as much as possible, to talk to each other (several are about 60 million). You will see talk to honest people who is not so traumatic. They succeed in many.
Always the day before, she has entertained the audience with the jolly retail accounts of your processes : "Today we celebrate the 2.952esima sitting at my expense. I am the man on trial in Italy, I had 103 cases, over 50 went to trial ". Excuse the indiscretion, but whoever writes the lyrics? Who has made up his mind this nonsense? Olindo Sallusti? Philip Mèches? Ferrara Ostellino pant or panty? Take a listen to us, that your processes will lovingly follow the very beginning: the procedures are all over thirty , 19 of which went to trial and other stores. Even assuming that each trial has produced one hundred hearings, exorbitant, we would be well under 2,000.
At this point, however, since you claims to have "spent 600 billion lire" (300 million euro) in lawyers in 17 years, there arises a suspicion that his lawyers did not tell it to him right. Moreover, the same ones who had guaranteed the finest in the constitutionality of the award Schifani, Lodo Alfano, of such failure, the abolition of the appeal but only to the prosecutor, all trash regularly rejected by the Advisory Body (and not because the consultation is left, but because the stuff was unconstitutional). Already we seem to see them while also invented the process that you did not, have to say someone stole : in the morning leaving saying "President, this morning there is the process Spectre" , "Today we debate If Supercazzola Brematurata ", " Tomorrow we have not, there ludienza scandal Comefosseantani ", " We come from the court, thanks to us you have been acquitted of abigeato ". Then go Camporella, or billiards, or the circus. And you pay.
0 comments:
Post a Comment